Back       Home       Forward

Back       Home       Forward

Text Box: Whartson Hall Mk.2

As you have seen from the apologises on the front of this copy of the site I have been somewhat stricken for quite a while and Whartson Hall No.1 has been gathering dust in the club room during that period. Why, I don’t know. Most of the members knew the details of the project and the donkey work had been completed, even the electrical system was complete, and it only needed the final alignment of the fiddle-yard tracks to take place. However, nothing was done.

 

Presumably, after discussion, the members decided a dismantle Mk.1 and construct a Mk.2 to replicate the busy stretch of line. This was to be the same size and shape but to be in many sections so that it “fit into a family car”. I own and Rover 45 and transported the whole of Mk.1 to the club in one go, so why this was deemed a good idea or even required, I cannot say. One of the tenets of building the original layout was to see if it could be done using only what was to hand, this was include everything except the track, and resulted in many variations from normal in construction, but it was achieved. This idea was seemingly abandoned.

 

In with the New

Fresh wood and ply was purchased and new baseboards constructed to allow smaller sections to transported. The fiddleyard was shrunk to nine lines and a gap in the middle of the layout was created to allow for operators. The diagram in the top right-hand corner of this page gives a vague idea of the symmetry of the new lay-out, but is inaccurate in the form the turnouts will take. The idea of 3-way points is a non-starter because of cost.

 

“Raison D'être”

In my opinion the reason for building a model of this section of the railway (the amount and variety of its traffic on any track) has been lost. Freight trains are long and impressive,  but each will require a complete fiddle-yard section therefore they will be compromised in number and variety. Multiple unit services will need to be seen on all tracks, which will require a unit for each part of the yard  both Voyager, super Voyager, Class 170 and HST125 (a 125 alone will consume a whole fiddleyard section). I fear that members still think they are dealing with a bucolic steam cross country line and not with a present-day  major West-North express railway which absorbs passengers and freight from all corners of the country and has major numbers of infrastructure trains from one of the larger maintenance depots.

 

Forward, Anyway!

David and I are presently laying track in the fiddle yard and trying to use the turnouts that are available in our “stores” cupboard to complete the job. Great fun is possible trying get an assortment of long, short, straight, curved, left and right and “Y” points to make cohesive and usable fiddle-yard. Full marks to Dave and his ingenuity, as we are slowly getting there, I

think. Dave does the creative stuff and I lay the straight bits We are using the tried and trusted method of “suck it and see”, in construction..

As for the operators “well”, we are finding that it would be advisable for:-  a. Me to lose weight or shrink  b. to clone Dave as another operator.

The Structures seem to be causing some confusion, the members seem to want to produce a copy of Water Orton with its complicated station structure and hundreds of small trees. This was something which I have considered but feel it too time-consuming to do properly, given the time constraints now apparent after the agreement to exhibit in 2018.

 

We have produced a 3 track model based on Water Orton, which would have an “imagined” junction either end to give the intensity, diversity and traffic movements we would require for exhibition operation. On Whartson Hall Mk1, I used “Water Orton” as the base because of the huge amount of information, maps, drawings and photos accumulated while building the original model as I felt that acquiring or creating more detail/information would be counterproductive. It was an exercise in what could be created  from the “useful” drawer and was a gift “kit” from me to the club.

 

The scenic break “constructions” used the road bridge by the station and a  hole in the western end scenery (which could be hidden by the embankment and trees) to create the separations needed, but also provided areas for the dissemination of Club propaganda.

 

Mk2 is a variant of Mk1. It retains the same scenic layout because of operational considerations, “something occurring all the time” be it slow or fast, but it is not Water Orton! I say this because many of the structures originally contemplated may be awkward and time consuming to create and it has huge numbers of trees (which seem to be problem). On Mk1 I merely created roughly the general topography of the area and left it at that, only because there has to be a reason why rail-tracks bend in way they do. Water Orton is as is because it heads west and went through a range of low hills and over a river. The model under creation is not Water Orton, it is a convenient track format to allow the most entertaining display of modern traction we can muster. It is a “free-lance” model to be created by the club. If trees are too much of an effort, double the size of factory, bring the sewage farm forward a few hundred feet and model the ponds, make the Tame follow the railway further in towards the station before bending away. If we are really desperate, bring a short section of HS2 over the western end to create a scenic break. If we had more room; I toyed with the idea of modelling a “fix” for the delays seen by building a fly-over for Bescot/Sutton Junction. Maybe we could sell the idea to BR?

We must use our imaginations and construct something which can be taken forward quickly.

 

People are right, a deadline really concentrates the mind!

MPT

 

More to come as we grind forward.